Q3 strikes partnership with RAW Social Enterprise

Q3 is an FM challenger brand with a reputation for doing things differently. Supply chain, innovation and sustainability are integral to this approach and, in a new partnership with RAW Social Enterprise, the company is looking to further enhance its position as a service provider with social value, responsible procurement and the circular economy at the heart of its offer.

RAW is Europe’s most socially impactful supplier of commercial furniture and provider of sustainable circular economy services. With 75% of its staff having overcome some of life’s toughest challenges, including addiction and mental health issues, RAW also creates opportunities for people to thrive.

RAW designs, manufactures and sources high quality indoor and outdoor commercial furniture from its base in Oxford and also operates RAW Harvesting, providing class-leading, sustainable, circular economy services maximising furniture re-use.

“In the UK, it’s disgraceful that businesses are accountable for disposing of over 50% of unwanted office furniture to landfill – that’s 300 tonnes of furniture, every working day”, says Martyn Freeman, CEO of Q3. “Partnering with RAW will enable us to offer clients both new furniture options with real social value built-in, as well as routes to bring current furniture back to life.”

Q3 believes that FM companies can play an important role in helping clients adopt a more sustainable attitude to new build, refurbishment and fit out projects, by investing in a more responsible approach to the procurement of their furniture.

Through its relationship with RAW, Q3 is looking to offer clients furniture that is not only more cost-effective, but also durable, attractive, and featuring design-led aesthetics. RAW’s exceptional manufacturing capabilities will make it possible to incorporate a high degree of personalisation, incorporating corporate branding and matching colour schemes.

Rick Mower, MD of RAW, said, “I think this relationship has such huge synergies and underpinned by our shared values, I’m excited by the impact we can create together”.

Martyn Freeman concluded, “This is a great opportunity to help both Q3 and our clients achieve ESG, Net Zero and social value goals”.

Jayne Lilley – IWFM Level 3 success, with distinction

Back in January, we published an article in our “Q-Who?” series, featuring Jayne Lilley who is Assistant Facilities Manager at one of Catapult Satellite Application’s key sites, the Westcott Space Cluster.

Alongside her day-to-day duties, Jayne had also been undertaking IWFM’s Level 3 qualification in Facilities Management. Just recently, the results have been published, and we are delighted to announce that Jayne has passed with flying colours – with across-the-board distinctions!

She explained, “To be honest, I had a little cry because I had been initially hesitant about doing this qualification. It had been many years since I had undertaken any form of further education because, back in the day, I really disliked the traditional school system of learning by rote and testing by exam.

“However, the IWFM tutor encouraged me to think differently, explaining that the IWFM qualification was a very different process, with workshop learning, that was much better suited to my visual learning style.”

The L3 qualification is structured in three parts:

  • submission of a 2,500-word project related to the candidate’s role,
  • a 20-minute presentation with an independent assessor focusing on the candidate’s knowledge, skills and behaviours
  • a 20-minute Q&A and a further 40-minute general interview discussion.

Jayne explained, “I threw myself into the challenge and worked very hard. Nevertheless, I still had self-doubt, worries about failing and having to confess to my colleagues! But when I opened the portal and discovered the results, I was completely bowled over! I have received so many good wishes and congratulations from colleagues at Q3 and Catapult and I am glad I made the commitment.”

Paul Courtney, HR advisor, said, “We are very proud to support colleagues like Jayne who invest in their personal and professional growth through apprenticeships and recognised qualifications. Her success is an excellent example of how commitment to learning benefits both the individual and the wider business, and we look forward to seeing Jayne continue to build on this fantastic achievement in her role”.

Maria Russell, Estates and Facilities Manager at Space Applications Catapult, said, “It’s been a real pleasure working alongside Jayne and seeing the dedication she’s put into achieving this qualification. Earning distinctions across all three categories is an outstanding accomplishment and a reflection of her commitment, professionalism, and depth of knowledge. The result comes as no surprise — she consistently brings a high standard to everything she does. This is a well-deserved success, and the whole Estates team are incredibly proud of her. “

Some additional thoughts from Paul Courtney, HR Advisor and the driver behind Q3’s apprenticeship programme:

Paul Courtney - HR Advisor

“When Jayne started with Q3 Services, it was a business requirement for her to undertake an L3 Facilities Management Apprenticeship.

I remember the first initial call with Jayne, who admitted that she was extremely nervous about taking on an apprenticeship, especially as it has been a while since she undertook a structured formal qualification. So, I was delighted when Jayne messaged me to inform me that she had her results back.

When Jayne informed me that she had achieved a distinction in all 3 assessments, I was not surprised as Jayne had constantly overachieved in all aspects of this qualification, and it was a real privilege to attend the review meetings with her development coach, who constantly praised Jayne’s dedication to all tasks.

As a business, we are absolutely delighted to learn that Jayne has achieved a distinction in all three areas following her End Point Assessment for the Level 3 Facilities Management qualification.

This is an outstanding accomplishment and a real testament to Jayne’s dedication, professionalism, and commitment to her own development, especially in the context of changing work demands and responsibilities.

We are very proud to support colleagues like Jayne, who invest in their personal and professional growth through apprenticeships and recognised qualifications. Her success is an excellent example of how commitment to learning benefits both the individual and the wider business, and we look forward to seeing Jayne continue to build on this fantastic achievement in her role.

Furthermore, we are extremely fortunate to work alongside clients who share Q3’s commitment to recognising, developing, and investing in individuals, helping to create opportunities for long term growth and success.”

Martyn Freeman – The View from the Other End of the Telescope

Introduction

The UK facilities management (FM) industry stands at a pivotal moment. While the market has grown and evolved, the sector’s increasing complexity has created a widening gap between what some large providers deliver and what many clients truly need. This article explores the FM landscape from the perspective of a challenger organisation – Q3, founded by leaders who have experienced both the scale of major FM corporations and the agility of a new entrant.

In my presentation at Workplace Futures, and in this piece, I draw on real-life examples to demonstrate how smaller, highly responsive FM providers can deliver value through personalised service models, empowered people, modern flexible technology, and a renewed focus on fundamentals that the industry too often overlooks.

I will share some insights gained from building an FM organisation from scratch, seeing the industry from the “other end of the telescope,” and understanding the gaps between large‑scale FM delivery and the needs of modern clients.

The history

After thirty years in FM, working for some of the biggest organisations in the industry, I took the opportunity in 2018 to start something entirely new: a challenger brand based in the Thames Valley with a clear vision of doing things differently. What followed was a rapid, unexpected journey that revealed a great deal about how the FM sector functions and where it needs to change.

Starting from Zero: A New Perspective

Launching a new FM enterprise immediately exposed the realities faced by SMEs:

  • We had no credit history. Even simple things like sourcing a phone contract became a challenge
  • Long‑term suppliers from previous relationship suddenly became disinterested
  • Former clients were reluctant to engage now that the logos and scale had disappeared
  • Previous corporate status offered no leverage in a small‑business environment

The instant loss of “big-company kudos” demonstrated how deeply the industry (wrongly) equates size with capability. However, for the new management team, it reinforced the value of agility, flexibility, and quality over scale – principles that shaped Q3 from the outset.

The Q3 Strategy

Our growth strategy focused on three pillars:

  1. Employing Quality People
  2. Delivering Quality Services
  3. Working with Quality Clients to create Quality Workplaces

This simple philosophy is the origin of the Q3 name and remains central to our approach today.

FM Today: A Market of Complexity and Contradictions

The FM market is vast, diverse, and increasingly dominated by large organisations. Ironically, outsourcing which was originally created to simplify operations and improve cost‑effectiveness, has evolved into a system burdened by its own complexity.

Large providers have created what might be termed “oil tanker syndrome”:

  • Slow to turn
  • Heavy internal governance
  • Standardised models driven by corporate needs rather than client needs
  • Inherent inflexibility
  • Increasingly distant from front‑line reality

As the big become bigger through mergers and acquisitions, SMEs must differentiate rather than imitate.

 Competing as a Challenger FM Provider

Realistically, SMEs cannot, and should not, attempt to win the Barclays of this world. Likewise, major FM organisations rarely need to pursue small £3m‑scale contracts. The market segmentation is clear – know your client sweet-spot and stick to it.

Successful challenger providers focus on:

Selective Targeting

Choosing clients whose needs align with SME strengths:

  • Agility
  • Customisation
  • High‑touch service
  • Direct senior involvement

 Value‑Based Differentiation

Competing on value, not volume. For SMEs, this means building contracts around the client rather than offering off‑the‑shelf solutions. A notable example is our partnership with Catapult where the client’s, post-tender feedback was, You didn’t tell me how I should fit into your box; you showed how you would fit into ours.”
This approach strengthens relationships, builds trust, and creates long‑term retention.

Senior Leadership Visibility

Unlike larger organisations, we maintain direct board‑level engagement throughout the life of every contract. Senior leaders regularly visit sites, meet clients, and speak with frontline colleagues. Clients know they can call us directly and get a solution immediately.

And because we don’t have layers of off-the-bench resources waiting in the background, every new contract demands that we hire the right person specifically for that client. Decisions are always guided by what will serve the client best.

The Supply Chain and the SME Challenge

Many small FM providers rely heavily on subcontracting models, working for the larger Property & FM companies. While common, this introduces challenges:

  • Managing agents become the “client,” limiting direct relationships
  • Risk increases
  • Innovation is stifled
  • Intellectual property can be lost
  • Providers have no access to client decision‑makers
  • SMEs can be disproportionately affected by failures in the chain, as seen with the Carillion collapse

Q3 deliberately avoids dependence on subcontracting for core delivery. When we work with partners, they are locally selected, locally coordinated, and part of a cohesive value‑creating model, not an outsourced commodity layer.

People First: The Core of FM

Yes, it’s a cliché, but FM is, and always has been, a people industry. While technology and data are evolving rapidly, frontline expertise remains the most powerful driver of service quality.

We champion a genuine, people-first approach:

  • Recognising talent within the business and supporting career growth
  • Bringing in high‑skilled individuals from outside FM to enrich our capability
  • Listening closely to frontline colleagues whose insights often reveal the most valuable improvements

One of the most impactful examples is hiring a young data analyst with no prior FM experience to administer and develop our CAFM platform, Facilio. We received over two hundred applications for the role, and he was one of a handful with no FM sector experience. But we hired him because his analytical skills transformed the contract’s performance, demonstrating how cross‑industry talent can elevate FM delivery.

Once people are in the FM sector and understand it, we are great at developing careers in different directions within our organisation. In our senior leadership we have a Finance director who used to be a personal assistant and an HR director who used to head up bid management.

In an interesting example of reciprocal trading, we also partner with employability programmes such as the Restart Scheme through our client Maximus to bring new talent and opportunity into the sector.

Technology: Pragmatic, Not Flashy, or Tech for Tech’s sake

FM organisations frequently promote technology as a game‑changer. Everyone has worked themselves into a frenzy over the possibilities of AI. But too often, the rhetoric exceeds the reality.

Q3 takes a pragmatic, value‑focused approach:

  • We invest in modern, flexible CAFM platforms rather than expensive legacy systems
  • Our systems adapt to each client instead of forcing clients to fit a preset model
  • Data belongs to the client — we are custodians, not owners. At the end of the contract, they keep it
  • Integration with client systems is simple and seamless

Technology is only valuable when it directly enhances service quality, responsiveness, and decision‑making and that’s our philosophy before we scope out any tech solution on a contract.

The Industry Challenge: Profile and Perception

FM continues to struggle with visibility and recognition. This limits its influence at board level, reduces its perceived value, and hinders its ability to attract talent.

Part of the issue is that the industry undersells its fundamentals – the essential services that keep organisations functioning. There is too much focus on buzzwords, technology and new shiny things at the expense of any pride in core delivery.

To move forward, the industry needs a stronger, more unified voice. We must advocate for the value FM brings to UK plc and celebrate the successes that often go unrecognised.

Conclusion

Viewing FM from both ends of the telescope – the scale of major corporations and the agility of SMEs, provides powerful insights into how the industry must evolve.

Challenger organisations like Q3 will succeed by:

  • Staying flexible
  • Designing services around the client
  • Empowering people
  • Using technology with purpose
  • Retaining senior visibility
  • Being bold enough to do things differently

There is ample space in the market for disruptors with a different language and mindset. The future of FM belongs not only to the large and complex, but to the agile, the human‑centred, and the value‑driven.

 

Q3 commitment to oxfordworkplace strengthened by new appointment

We’re excited to welcome Praise Madzima as our new Business Development Manager, leading the way in delivering smarter, integrated estate and facilities solutions through our partnership with ODS – oxfordworkplace.

With a strong background in contract management, site surveying, and technical delivery, Praise brings a results-driven approach to aligning operational performance with commercial success.

Working closely with estates and facilities teams across Oxfordshire, Praise is set to streamline service delivery, cut inefficiencies, and build lasting, value-driven partnerships.

Welcome on board Praise. The unique FM model we’re building in oxforworkplace is really going places, and we’re pleased that you will be part of the journey.

The End of Outsourcing by Default

Why the new procurement reforms offer positive opportunities for Facilities Management – by Martyn Freeman, CEO of Q3 Services

Public sector procurement in the UK is entering a new era.

With the introduction of the National Procurement Policy Statement (NPPS) in 2025, alongside the Procurement Act 2023, the Government has made its expectations clear: public procurement must deliver more than the lowest price. It must deliver national value.

For Facilities Management, this marks a decisive shift away from outsourcing as the default option and towards a more deliberate, outcomes‑driven approach. At Q3 Services, we welcome this change. Not because it makes procurement easier, but because it makes it better.

From Cost to Contribution: A Fundamental Change in Direction

The NPPS places a statutory obligation on public bodies to consider how procurement decisions support wider government priorities including economic growth, resilience, social value, and sustainability.

Crucially, departments must now test whether services could be delivered more effectively in‑house before outsourcing major contracts. Outsourcing must be justified in the public interest, not assumed by default.

In my opinion, this is a healthy reset.

For too long, FM procurement has been overly shaped by price competition and scale. The new framework recognises that value is not just what a service costs, but what it contributes to service quality, local economies, workforce stability, and long‑term resilience.

What the New Framework Signals for FM Providers

1. Outsourcing Must Add Something the Public Sector Can’t Replicate

The introduction of a public interest test fundamentally changes the role of outsourced FM.

Public bodies now need clear evidence that an external provider brings specialist capability, innovation, or delivery models that cannot be easily delivered internally. Cost alone is no longer a sufficient rationale.

At Q3, our approach has always been about enhancing, not replacing, internal teams. We focus on areas where specialist expertise, data‑led insight, and integrated service models improve outcomes across estates, whether that’s compliance, performance, user experience, or continuous improvement.

The NPPS will rightly reward that mindset.

2. Procurement as a Tool to “Back Britain”

The new policy framework places a strong emphasis on domestic resilience and local impact. Public procurement is now explicitly positioned as a lever to support British jobs, skills, and supply chains. For FM, this really matters.

Facilities services are delivered by people, in workplaces, every day. Cleaning teams, engineers, security staff, and supervisors are embedded in local communities. When procurement values local employment, fair work, and UK‑based supply chains, it naturally aligns with how high‑quality FM is delivered.

At Q3, we see this as long‑overdue recognition that good FM is local, relational, and people‑centred, not simply transactional.

3. A Level Playing Field for Specialist SMEs

The Procurement Act reforms also aim to remove unnecessary barriers for SMEs, using simplified digital processes and a “tell-us-once” approach to bidding. This is good news for the smaller players in the FM sector.

Innovation in facilities management often comes from specialist providers, particularly British SMEs operating in areas such as sustainability, compliance, workplace technology, and energy management. By making procurement more accessible, the Government is encouraging a more diverse and capable supplier ecosystem.

Q3 actively supports this direction by building agile supply chains that prioritise expertise, reliability, and ethical delivery over sheer scale.

Social Value: From Promises to Proof

One of the clearest messages from the NPPS is that social value must now be delivered, measured, and reported, not just referenced in bids.

For larger contracts, annual reporting is mandatory. This moves social value from aspiration to accountability.

For Q3, this isn’t a challenge; it’s confirmation of the right approach. We believe social value should be designed into services, not bolted on at tender stage. Local employment, skills development, carbon reduction, and fair treatment of people are all outcomes that directly improve service quality and long‑term value for clients.

A Better Question for a Better System

The Procurement Act 2023 and the National Procurement Policy Statement are not anti‑outsourcing. They are anti‑lazy outsourcing.

They challenge clients and providers alike to ask a more intelligent question:

Not “Can this be done cheaper?”
But “Does this deliver better outcomes for people, places, and the public purse?”

At Q3 Services, we support this approach wholeheartedly. We believe it creates the conditions for stronger partnerships, better services, and a more resilient FM sector. One that genuinely serves the national interest.

We welcome the conversation this reform has started, and we look forward to working with public sector partners who see facilities management not as a commodity, but as a strategic contributor to public value.

Lucy Hayes, HR Director at Q3, shares her thoughts on the UK’s Employment Rights Act 2025

This new Act is set to bring some of the most significant changes to UK employment law in a generation, and for FM, it represents a mix of welcome improvements and practical challenges. From a people perspective, many of the changes are long overdue. Giving employees day-one rights for sick pay and family leave, alongside earlier protection from unfair dismissal at six months, will provide much-needed security for a workforce that is largely operational and customer-facing.

For people in FM roles, these changes are a real step forward in giving employees the support and security they deserve. Day-one rights for sick pay and family leave, along with earlier protection from unfair dismissal, mean employees can focus on their wellbeing and their work with confidence. This isn’t just beneficial for individuals though; it strengthens teams and helps ensure smooth, reliable service. When employees feel secure and valued, everyone benefits.

The Act also reinforces the importance of fairness and trust in the workplace. Ending “fire and rehire” practices and putting clearer expectations around dismissal procedures encourages businesses to step up their people management. At Q3, fairness, transparency and respect have always been central to how we manage our teams, so we wholeheartedly support the intent of this legislation. Employees knowing their rights, and that they will be upheld, helps build a stronger, more loyal workforce.

It’s important to consider both sides of the coin, however. The ban on zero-hours contracts, for example, removes a level of flexibility that can work well for both employers and employees when used responsibly. In a sector where demand can fluctuate daily, that flexibility is often vital. Then there’s the cost side: sick pay, parental leave, and other entitlements come with real financial implications, particularly in an industry like FM. We could see recruitment becoming more cautious, especially for entry-level roles, which could slow workforce mobility and even affect operations.

There’s also a practical element. Every business will need to review contracts, policies and procedures to ensure compliance. For smaller providers, that can place a real strain on time and resources. The intention behind the Act is unquestionably positive, but the realities for FM businesses need careful consideration if these changes are going to work in practice.

Overall, the Act is a step in the right direction for employees, and at Q3, we’re proud to already operate with fairness and transparency at the heart of what we do. At the same time, I hope policymakers continue to engage with our sector so that businesses can remain sustainable while delivering the protections and security employees rightly expect. The direction is right, but the sector’s unique challenges must not be overlooked.

Complex Campuses – Competitive Advantage

Facilities management on university campuses: turning complexity into an organisational strength

An opinion piece by Mark Hazelwood, MD of Q3’s IFM business, written originally for Campus Estate Management (January 2026)

Universities are highly complex environments, shaped by diverse building types, competing stakeholder needs and fluctuating occupancy patterns. Mark Hazelwood, managing director IFM/technical Services at Q3 Services, explains how modern facilities management (FM) tools can help universities navigate this by optimising energy use and sustainability performance, strengthening compliance and enhancing the everyday campus experience.

The university estate as a unique FM challenge

Universities effectively function as micro-cities, bringing together classrooms, offices, lecture halls, sports facilities, specialist labs, research centres, student accommodation and shared public spaces. Their properties also span a wide age range, with new, state-of-the-art facilities often sitting alongside older heritage structures. While an FM strategy might be replicated floor by floor in a conventional office block, the unique mix of spaces on university campuses demands a far more tailored and flexible approach.

Campuses also bring together a variety of stakeholders. Research departments want their facilities to produce high-quality results, while governing bodies, under growing pressure to meet ambitious sustainability targets, favour financial performance and ecological responsibility. In contrast, academic faculties prioritise student experience and educational outcomes. Balancing these objectives presents a constant challenge for estates managers; they must maintain spaces that support student results and world-class research, while controlling operational costs and environmental impact.

Adding to the challenge, university occupancy rates are rarely consistent. Even during summer when they are supposedly at their quietest, numbers can rapidly surge as graduation ceremonies draw in thousands of students and their families. Without closely monitoring fluctuating occupancy patterns and adjusting asset output accordingly, estates teams risk wasting substantial amounts of energy and money.

Ultimately, managing such complexity requires FM strategies that are just as multifaceted as campuses themselves. By tuning their approach to a university’s major financial, environmental, regulatory and academic objectives, teams can deliver meaningful improvements across their estates.

Running what you need, when you need it

The British higher education sector is facing a challenging financial period. Due to slow post-pandemic recovery rates and a decline in high fee-paying international students, many institutions have been forced to streamline their operational costs. A recent Universities UK survey found half of its respondents cutting certain courses, with 60 per cent also stripping back on repairs and maintenance.

This makes cost awareness a priority for the sector’s FMs, something that agile and occupancy-mirroring solutions contribute towards. Rather than allowing the building management system (BMS) to run on fixed schedules, they can be linked with a department’s academic timetables, space-booking systems and research cycles. With the rise in online learning, some lecture theatres now face empty periods for more time during the day, demanding less from heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems and lighting units. During certain days, these spaces may not need activating at all.

Reducing daily system output also extends asset lifecycles and minimises the need for emergency repairs. The Office for Students currently predicts that the combined annual site maintenance costs for higher education providers will rise by £33 million over the next three years. However, this could be mitigated if more streamlined, occupancy-sensitive FM strategies were implemented across the sector.

An eco-conscious strategy for each building

Environmental performance is also a focus for many universities. Alongside growing government and union pressure, sustainability has become a key point of interest for many prospective students. Research by SustainabilityOnline shows that 78 per cent of students would now choose a university with strong green credentials over one ranked highly for academic outcomes.

The first step in meeting these demands is to ditch a one-size-fits-all approach to building management. Applying blanket strategies across such varied portfolios only leads to energy waste and higher Scope 1 and 2 emissions, leaving institutions with overstated net-zero claims and weaker standings in environmental performance rankings.

Instead, a building-specific strategy that reflect the diverse energy demands across a campus is essential. Specialist research labs require high and consistent output to maintain precise conditions, while sports halls can operate at lower levels for much of the year. It’s often that natural heat is generated when they’re in use.

Property age is another key variable. Older structures are often incompatible with modern BMS and computer-aided facility management (CAFM) technology and therefore require far more manual oversight to maintain standards. Newer facilities, in contrast, can often integrate easier with smart, data-driven systems, enabling greater automation and optimisation.

Leveraging predictive and reactive tools

University buildings operate under some of the strictest regulatory standards in the education sector. In specialist testing centres and laboratories, even small lapses in temperature control disrupt operations, damage samples and invalidate results. Beyond initial non-compliance fines, failures like these can jeopardise future opportunities for funding, as well as industry partnerships and accreditations.

Predictive maintenance helps to prevent such issues before they escalate. Using precise sensors and real-time data tracking devices, facilities teams can detect subtle deviations in temperature, ventilation, air pressure and acoustics output and adjust them accordingly. This reduces asset downtime and ensures critical compliance thresholds are consistently met.

When faults do inevitably occur, clear communication channels are essential for optimising response times. Many now prefer accessible and easy-to-use reporting tools, such as mobile messaging or chat-based helpdesks. For lab technicians overseeing sensitive research projects, however, more formal escalation procedures should be provided – direct calls to estates control rooms or named contacts for urgent repairs.

Spaces geared towards student satisfaction and performance

Above all, university campuses should support strong academic outcomes. FM certainly has a role to play here, as shown by various reports on the effect of poor indoor environmental conditions on productivity. One recent study observed a significant drop in cognitive performance when indoor temperatures moved beyond the recognised comfort zone, specifically at 15ºC and 27ºC.

A human-centred FM approach is key to achieving this, especially demonstrated during assessment periods. When sports facilities are transformed into temporary exam halls, their indoor conditions must shift to reflect a different type of occupancy. Rather than running around in these spaces, students will be seated for extended periods of time. HVAC and lighting settings should be recalibrated for comfort, with indoor air quality and noise control evaluated well in advance.

Feedback loops must also be simple and ongoing. Accessible tools such as QR codes and more conversational check-ins with students and staff help in capturing issues early and informing necessary adjustments.

When it comes to managing successful and efficient university campuses:

  • Develop bespoke solutions for each building type: To maximise energy savings and drive sustainable performance, a flexible strategy that respects the unique circumstances of each facility is essential. Energy-intensive and compliance-critical spaces need tightly controlled FM regimes, while offices, lecture theatres and sports halls can operate under more flexible, occupancy-led scheduling.
  • Work closely with academic departments: Feed timetable data, space-booking information and research cycles into your BMS or CAFM systems so that asset output aligns with real-time use. This also shows you when facilities are in their lowest-activity periods, effectively highlighting the most suitable times for planned maintenance.
  • Know your end users: Provide accessible, varied channels for students and staff to report issues and continuously give feedback. This helps you understand how spaces are used, speeds up maintenance responses and strengthens overall trust in your services.

University estates are inherently complex, but not unmanageable. By aligning FM practices with each building’s requirements, live occupancy patterns and different stakeholder demands, the complexity can be transformed into an operational strength, delivering well-rounded performance across the entire estate.

 

Q-who? You cannot create experience – you have to undergo it!

Albert Camus once said, “You cannot create experience. You must undergo it.” And there aren’t many in the FM industry with more experience than Luis Lopes!

Luis is Q3’s Operations Director and was one of the original team when the business was formed in 2018. However, his experience in the industry goes way back to 1989 when he arrived from his native Portugal and got a job as a cleaner with a well-known cleaning company of that time, called Ramoneur. The company provided the first step on his career in FM and even helped him open his first bank account, with £1 to his name.

From there Luis progressed with Lancaster cleaning through a series of promotions, to be site supervisor, area supervisor and finally, area manager.

Then things really took an upward swing when he joined Cleanevent. Here, and later with Mitie’s specialist events and leisure division, he would be responsible for some iconic venues including Ascot Racecourse, Cheltenham Racecourse, Aintree Racecourse, Newmarket Racecourse, Tottenham Hotspur F.C., Arsenal F.C., Fulham F.C., Chelsea F.C., Aston Villa F.C., Twickenham Stadium, Wembley Stadium, Silverstone Circuit, Cheltenham Racecourse, Odyssey Arena, O2 Arena, Buckingham Palace, Tower of London, and Farnborough Air Show. That would look pretty good on anyone’s cv!!!

As well as managing cleaning on big-event days, there was also the day-to-day cleaning for the various conferences and meetings that these venues hosted to supplement their revenue, as well as out-of-season, deep clean projects. Luis learned how to be flexible, switching from the routine one day, to ramping up for the big-game events the next.

His management style, based on fostering close client relationships, goes right back to the lessons he learnt at that time. Regular face-to-face meetings to check clients were happy with the quality of service deliver, KPI performance, check H&S and compliance, and so on – exactly as he works today.
Luis will always build his diary around quality time with clients, making sure the relationship is good and that there’s a happy ship and crew. He still loves working in this FM business because every day is different and relationship building with many different clients and operatives is what keeps him stimulated and on his toes. But dealing with a challenging client, or a difficult member of staff, can still present a challenge, and he’s not afraid to set aside his usual friendly demeanour, play hard ball and make some tough decisions.

Having worked for both big and small FM companies, allows Luis to see things from two very different perspectives. For some clients, the big brand players can be a bit “marmite”, with lots of red tape, and it can be hard to get quick decisions. Small companies sometimes struggle with resource and to convince clients they have the ability and scale to do a job. But with Q3, he has the benefit of the experience from both ends of the industry and the autonomy to make things happen.

He loves nothing better than applying all those years of experience to tackle a situation and improve the way things are done, increase productivity, reduce costs, and get results.

“Experience beats knowledge every time!” is one of his favourite sayings.

As Q3 has evolved over the last 8 years, there have been openings and opportunities for Luis as the company has grown. That particular experience has been one of his favourite times, because in Luis’s own words, “It’s been awesome to be part of the journey

CAFM is a game-changer, but only when you get it right

Mark Hazelwood shares some lessons on making sure your CAFM deployment is a game-changer and not an expensive IT software failure.

Implementing CAFM platforms can be a real game-changer, yet too often I see organisations rolling them out without making the essential investment that really drives value: the data. A CAFM system, no matter how sophisticated, is only ever as effective as the quality of the information it holds, and the culture that surrounds its use. When we implement CAFM, we treat it as a living, breathing ecosystem. That means making sure everyone involved in the FM service – clients, internal teams, suppliers – use it as their single source of truth. If tasks are still being tracked in Excel or email, then the whole point has been missed. Everything must happen within the system.

We’ve seen the added value it offers in action through our contract with Maximus, a specialist service organisation for health and employability, where we cover over 160 locations across the UK. More than 90% of all service calls are logged directly via our CAFM portal. Maximus don’t need to spend time calling or emailing, as they engage with us entirely through the platform. Costs are authorised, data is shared, and reporting is live and fully interactive. We don’t rely on third-party tools or portals; it’s all native to the system.

Integration is key. We’ve connected our CAFM with finance systems, IoT sensors for real-time fault detection, and compliance tools like SFG20. We also use Facilitiesline to monitor supplier accreditations, getting live alerts if anything changes, from expired insurance to health and safety issues. It means we’re not just ticking boxes; we’re operating proactively and with full visibility.

Security is another priority. Given recent high-profile breaches reported in the media, our clients need absolute assurance that their data is safe. Our CAFM is securely hosted and architected with enterprise-level information security in mind.

Lastly, we believe in doing right by the client. Too many providers hand over a CSV file at the end of a contract and call it a day. We take a different view. Our contracts allow clients to transfer ownership of the live system itself. They don’t lose continuity or insight, but retain a working, live environment. It’s about integrity, transparency, and long-term thinking. The way I see it, CAFM is not just a tool but a strategic investment in data, and when you get it right, it transforms how FM can be delivered.

 

Q-Who? High-stakes FM and a rekindled passion for learning

Jayne Lilley’s experience proves that in Facilities Management, you never stop learning

I started this assistant facilities manager role with Q3 in 2024 and I am responsible for overseeing FM on one of Catapult Satellite Application’s key sites, the Westcott Space Cluster. The position was newly created to provide greater focus, quicker decision-making and a stronger day-to-day presence on the site. Beforehand, one manager was responsible for both Westcott and another major site, which meant they had to share their time between both sites.

Although I’m employed by Q3, I work on site with Catapult every day. Being integrated means I’m closely involved with the people, buildings and activities on campus ­– a presence that is essential for managing such a complex and high-stakes environment.

Reactivity and a diverse range of facilities

One of my key responsibilities is responding quickly to any issue that arises. As many of the spaces here support high-value technical work, essential maintenance often can’t wait as it might be able to elsewhere.

Westcott is made up of a wide range of buildings with distinct purposes. The Westcott Innovation Centre includes a reception, meeting rooms and tenant spaces, but we also have a technical building that houses robots and 3D metal printers, a network development centre focused on advanced connectivity, and a drone port with large hangars.

Understanding the different requirements of each space is crucial. While faulty air conditioning in a meeting room is manageable, the stakes are much higher in a technical innovation space. Here, consistent asset output is paramount, as equipment must be maintained at very specific temperatures. Ultimately, knowing what to prioritise and when immediate action is required are both central to my role.

Because of this, constant monitoring takes up large parts of my day. I usually start with visual checks across every building. Some spaces may not have been entered by an engineer for a few days, so it’s important to ensure everything looks as it should. I check equipment levels and look out for leaks, especially during periods of bad weather.

A bridge between Q3 and Catapult

I often describe my role as the bridge between client and provider. Catapult is our client, so I’m responsible for making sure their needs are understood and met. At the same time, I feed information back to Q3 to ensure communication flows clearly in both directions, and we can optimise our service.

Being on site every day helps to build the trust needed to manage such highly technical and labour-intensive spaces. Catapult’s recent contract extension with Q3 has given me confidence that my role is strengthening our on-site operations and overall client relationship.

The value of formal FM training

Alongside my day-to-day duties, I’ve also been undertaking IWFM’s Level 3 qualification – something I was initially quite hesitant about. With 12 years of practical industry experience and some negative past experiences with education, the idea of returning to formal learning wasn’t particularly appealing.

Q3 and my IWFM tutor encouraged me to think differently. After honest discussions about my doubts, I decided that Level 3 would be a more comfortable starting point than the Level 4 course we had originally planned for.

I was genuinely surprised by how much I enjoyed it. Revisiting areas such as risk assessments and compliance proved extremely valuable, and I now approach familiar situations with a completely fresh mindset. It also highlighted how much legislation and best practice in FM continues to evolve.

The way the training is delivered made a significant difference too. While I was pessimistic about taking written exams, the value placed on projects, discussions and presentations really suited my preference for hands-on learning.

Overall, my advice to anyone considering IWFM training: be honest with your tutor or coach about what you’re comfortable with. Starting at Level 3 gave me the foundations and confidence I might not have gained straight away at Level 4. With that first course behind me, I now feel far more open to taking the next step.